Monday, May 28, 2007
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
And I'll repeat what I've said before and will continue to say, probably to everyone's great annoyance. This is the heart of a good education: a small but well-chosen library, a place to sit and study, some friends to do it with, and the time and tranquility to do it in. There's such an immense, mind-bogglingly complicated tangle of extraneous issues attached to the concept of education, it's a wonder anybody ever gets one or even knows what one is. It's not about grades or credits. Those things may be necessary to get into college, but they're not part of education and it's all we can do to keep them from interfering with real education; mostly we fail at that. It's not about getting a job; that's for machines, not men and women created in the image of God. It's not about schedules and buildings and administrations and academic years and budgets and playgrounds and buses and meetings and athletics and art and field trips and curricula and email lists and offices and secretaries and science fairs and trips to the principal's office for misbehavior and lunchroom tables and drama departments and spirit week and community service and field day and school newspapers and multimedia. It's about Mark Hopkins on one end of a log and the student on the other.
Read the best books and talk about them with like-minded friends. That's been the essence of real education since antiquity, and nothing about our modern world changes that except perhaps the pandemic idiocy that gives this idea even greater urgency and even less chance than ever of being taken seriously. "
I appreciate what this man says about education. Having studied Greek and Roman history (and world history, for that matter), what I found in common with all the great minds in history is leisure. From Socrates, to Seneca, to the American farmer of the 18th century who was smarter than our Ph.D.'s of today - they had leisure. They worked hard, but that wasn't life. If knowing God is a great part of the journey here on earth, then certainly it must happen that we take time to reflect on the more meaningful things in this world, and pursue being truly acquainted with God's creation.
For the record, though, I do not believe leisure can be equated with rest (though they might be related), and certainly not with idleness. Leisure is not plopping on the couch with a coke, bag of chips and a remote. It is work in itself, but a different kind.
Aaron and I have been talking about this. We feel very busy. We're a newly-married couple with one child, a 5yo niece who is staying with us and one more blessing on the way. That may keep us busy, but we shouldn't feel so urgent. We are talking about the "simple life" and are discovering that it's possible it doesn't just exist in our long-term dream of being on the family farm in Missouri. We suspect it has more to do with our pace, with our family priorities and committments than anything else. We know that when we are not home as often we pray less, we sing less, we meditate on God's Word less, we talk less, we read less. We want to change that.
If you're wondering how I'm going to justify discussing this on Joseph's blog, here's my explanation. All this talk about leisure, the simple life and our "pace" is really just another way of discussing our philosophy of education or homeschooling. I've been homeschooling now for 9 months, so it would be impossible to give you any concrete assertions or observations. But I believe that Aaron and I might not fit into any particular category of homeschooling style: Charlotte Mason, classical, unschooling, unit studies, etc. I think we talk more about our family culture and what that should look like. What is home? What will it feel like? What will our loves be? Our goals? Priorities?
Whatever we decide will have an impact on (or direct correlation to) how our children are educated. The "methods" and curriculum matter very little. What do you love? What do you do with your free time? What do you say is important to you? We want a home and a family life that reflects our desire (for our children, and also for us) to love God and know Him more.
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
Quick Update
Anyhow, here's how we are:
Joseph is doing so well. Miraculously, he slept through the night ALL NIGHT Friday, Sunday and last night. A wonderful birthday present for Mama, eh? :)
He's pulling up and says Mama and Dada all the time. Does he know what it means?
We're trying to wean and I'm finally seeing the light at the end of the ugly tunnel. We've been starting with lunch and substituting Mama with some warmed whole Braum's milk with extra goodies in it (like oils and live bacteria). Today he drank a whopping 4 oz. - and happily, I might add. Lunch was blissful - for the first time in 3 weeks.
He knows how to sign "more".
But he's a little sinner and is now refusing to. I don't mean to be ugly. It's pretty normal and all. It's that his little stubborn and willful heart doesn't want to do what Mama says if it's not on his agenda. We've had a few standoffs in the last two days (with Mama offering his favorite yummy yogurt), and after about 10 minutes of crying, pouting, zoning out, smiling, manipulating, etc. - I won. :) He put his chubby fingers together and signed "more" - all the yogurt he wants!
He is getting more disciplined and submissive in other areas. We are very thankful he is learning to respond quickly when we tell him "no". Most times he stops mid-action and does something else. God is good!
We had to lower his crib to the last slat. I hope he doesn't like to do "Tigger" like his Daddy did.
I've kind of abandoned "listening time". I can't seem to find the time to do it during the week. Must work on this. I enjoyed it when I did do it, and saw benefits from it.
Joseph has gone from a "one bowel movement every 2-3 day" kind of guy, to a "thrice daily" kind of guy. I'm sure that's better for him.
He smiles all the time. With the exception of my wonderful husband, no one charms me like Joseph.
He has learned to "click" his tongue in mimic of us. Karina actually taught him how to do this. Their relationship is truly amazing. He will do what she does. Follow her where she goes. And smile at her for no better reason than she's a 5yo wonderful cousin to him. :)
That's all for now. My baby is beginning to look like a boy. And soon enough he'll be a big brother, too. :)
Thursday, April 19, 2007
You had to be there...
You had to be there...
Friday, April 13, 2007
"If you believe in Space, you believe Jesus"
I'm sorry for the absence lately on this blog. The last two or three weeks have been a hectic jumble of sickness, minor diseases and a trip to boot. I hope we're settling back into a routine, or at least something like it.
For those of you who haven't heard, Karina has also become my dietician. She believes I need help remembering what is best to eat, and is very concerned about that. This is because we're having another baby! She wants to make sure that baby is healthy and growing and strong. I appreciate her love for our baby. :)
So, this past week I've been very tired and somewhat queasy. The kids have been wonderful. I remember this from last time, and it passed around the 16th week. Until then, Karina is being a great helper, and I'm thankful that Joseph is crawling around and having no trouble entertaining himself. Please pray for God's blessing on this child also! We are so excited about this gift!
Here are some pictures for all of you:
Monday, April 02, 2007
Timely Encouragement
http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2007/03/29/home-school-mothers-the-beatrice-brigade/
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
What Karina and I Did Today
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Spring is for Change
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Spring is here
Friday, March 02, 2007
Listening Time
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Schedules or What I've Learned (Mostly from Others) Since Being a Mama
"I was thinking about it and I know you're different from me. You might be able to handle more than I can, or like it busier than I do. Which is great. But if you're exhausted, frustrated, stressed, or wondering how you're going to get everything done, it's okay to change things. In fact, women are teaching me that to be a good steward you should.
Before you go change anything, though, it's best to actually take a look at your schedule. What you're already doing, and see if you can condense, rearrange or organize your life to make it smoother. WHich is what we did today.
I've also attached two schedules I've used since being married. One before the baby came and one after. The one after the baby came was when Joseph was about 1 month, so it's about the same time you're dealing with now. This schedule was "abbreviated" - it's not what my ideal schedule/normal routine would be. But it's what I thought was semi-realistic with what I was going through then. Although our boys' schedules may look different, it might also give you an idea of what I felt I could handle. Please know that I didn't accomplish everything on my list each day. In fact, it was rare that I did. But it was nice to see that, say, if I didn't get to mopping the kitchen floor, since it was on the schedule for next Monday, I knew I could get to it then, if I was able.
My philosophy of schedules is in the making, but has transformed into something like this: This schedule exists to give me an idea of what to expect and what to do next so that I'm being orderly and efficient. If I miss something, it's okay. If I can't do something, that's okay too. The schedule helps me to pick up after I get out of whack and helps to create order in my attempts to take care of the house and my child. "
Dear friends and family, please be sure to remind me of all this when I'm not so sane or as calm as I am today. Remind me that I (myself!) actually believe these things when I'm stressed that I can actually see dust on my mantle, or that I killed another plant by starvation, or when I have to step over the laundry to get to Joseph's room. Remind me so that I don't have a breakdown, or decide that feminists aren't so crazy after all. Remind me so that I don't only hear that I'm "prone to evil and slothful in good", but also that I'm redeemed and being transformed daily by grace. It's hard to remember, so thanks a bunch.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Joseph's New Sisters Pets Dinner
(Nearly) 7 months
We're doing Lent. We gave up red meat and treats (except Sundays). As a first-timer, though, I completely forgot and had a beef taco (twice), two peanut
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Joseph's Literary Future, Part III
Now, where it gets sticky for me is in actually discerning which books/music/art/movies are "reflectional" and which are actually "sensational". What I have gathered is that it is not true that Christian = Reflectional and Secular = Sensational. As I said before, I have read "Christian" novels that are sensational in that they encourage young women to lose themselves in a silly love story that only makes them discontent with their own life, or encourages them to lust after some boy like so-and-so did in the book. I have heard "Christian" songs that have an awful lot to say about themselves and not much about Jesus; or that lack skill or beauty. Or even Christian movies (say, "The Omega Code") that don't have a point. What about that movie will lead me to reflection that changes my heart?
Aaron and I both listen to "secular" music quite a bit. We love their willingness to disucss life - its beauties, attractions, pleasures, but also its disappointments, hardships and surprises. Nonchristians know about life, that's for sure. And there are many lessons to be learned from the author of a song who has messed up his entire life by pursuing vainly all the pleasures of this world, and is still hopeless by the end of the song. It makes me think about my own life and what I'm pursuing, and it makes me praise God for redeeming me and giving me peace and true life. Or the movie "Braveheart". It is exceptionally graphic (and is a "borderline" movie in my opinion), but William Wallace inspires us to think about what is truly important, what we're willing to die for, and what we truly live for.
Charlotte says that one key thing is that if you're not reflecting on whatever you're reading/watching/listening to, then you won't glean anything anyway. It doesn't matter if it's a "great" book or an "awesome" song. If you don't think about it and study it, it might as well be a "sensational" book. It's produced the same shallow results.
I am most willing to acknowledge that the line is fuzzy for me. What is okay and what isn't? What is too graphic? What focuses too much on sin or its pleasures? What is age appropriate? Is there a different tolerance level for boys and girls, and each individual? Does the moral always have to be obvious?
Aaron and I have much to figure out, but we are working through these principles. Aaron put it this way: "When children are very young, they need fairy tales and storybooks to help them develop emotionally and morally; and when they're older but still young, fiction is the step between childhood and adulthood. They're not ready to enter the world and face its reality. Fiction helps them with that."
My husband is a genius. :)
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Joseph's Literary Future, Part II
She suggests novels. An odd idea, I know. Yet, think about what a novel offers a young person: "Here is the very knowledge of life the young person craves; the personages of the novel play their parts before him, and he is admitted to greater intimacy with them than we often arrive at with our fellows...If the novelist moralise a little here and there, it is but to relieve his own feelings. He is not preaching to the young reader, to whom the lessons of life come home with illustrations never to be forgotten."
Not just any novel would offer us these kinds of "lessons of life" and knowledge that helps. Charlotte distinguishes between "sensational novels" (of which I've read my share: they evoked a blush from me much more than a contemplative "hmm") and "reflectional novels". "The reflectional novel is one which, like this of Pendennis, awakens reflection with every page we read; offers in every character and in every situation a criterion by which to try our random thoughts or our careless conduct. If we bear in mind that the obvious reflection proposed to us is as vicious in its way as the sensation suggested, we shall find that this test––the property of arousing reflection––eliminates all flimsy work, and confines us to the books of our great novelists. "
Novels, if properly chosen, can bring about in our children (and ourselves!) a kind of reflection that leads to evaluation, and then change. Of course, reflection without a standard by which to judge it would be useless. And I think Charlotte assumes that. If your children read about a slothful boy who becomes desolate and poor, you want them to be hard workers after reading that book. Making sure their minds are filled with "he who does not work does not eat" and "work in all things as unto the Lord" will help, I think.
All this is why I want Joseph to be exposed to the best literature we can find. I want him to meet all sorts of people who inspire him, educate him, enlighten him. Characters who will show him all the sorts of goodness in this world, and the evil. But there are objections to this method of education. Even in the 19th century, mothers were still saying, "'I have striven to bring up my family in innocence, and wish to keep them still from that very knowledge of life which novels offer'" (374). This is a particularly popular view in mainstream churches. Mothers (and fathers, too, I suppose) don't want their children exposed to "secular" anything because they fear that knowledge of the world will rob them of their innocence.
It's a fair objection to pose. Yet "we must remember that ignorance is not innocence, and also that ignorance is the parent of insatiable curiosity" (375). It's one thing to pollute yourself with the world by drinking deeply of its knowledge, for "it is shameful to even mention what the evil do in secret" (Ephesians 5: 12). We should not discuss/describe/ponder all the details of sin. Examples of this (I think), are sex education in public schools. Or the "sensational" novels that have breathy descriptions of being in rapturous love (even in some "Christian" romance novels) that tempt us to want to feel as the characters do. Or the graphic descriptions of the lives of drug addicts. If all a novel does is portray sin in a way that appeals to your emotions, tickles your ears, or encourage morbid fascination, then of what value is it?
Joseph's Literary Future, Part I
Have you ever heard of Charlotte Mason? She was a Christian, British woman who lived from 1842-1923 and was aboslutely dedicated to truly educating students and to education itself.
Charlotte Mason wrote a series of discussions of education and I've been reading a selection of one today. In it, she discusses the book Pendennis, by William M. Thackeray (most famous for his book Vanity Fair). Arthur Pendennis is the hero, a young man raised to think himself far superior in ability and rank than he really is. This Arthur comes of age and begins to surround himself with men who are successful, based on shallow (read, worldly) standards, which encompasses money, good taste and snobby manners.
Why do young people often seem to fall for this? Even today? Charlotte says that "there is no art than that...about which boys are more anxious to have an air of knowingness" (CM Series p. 372). As children, they adore and worship their parents. "We elders are hardly aware of the ingenuousness of the young mind, of the ignorance and simplicity of youth; and, at the same time, we fail to realise the reverence in which young people hold us just for our experience' sake" (371).
But, "the young folk will have a knowledge of what they call 'life.' If we offer them our scraps of, perhaps, secondhand experience, they generalise and conclude that we are not really the worthy and perhaps rather saintly persons they had taken us for...Here we perceive the cause of the incomprehensible attractiveness of bad companions––they know life" (372).
How true that is! I remember feeling this very thing as a 13-year-old girl. Sitting in a classroom before the teacher arrived, I listened to other students talk and was enamored with this girl or that one because she knew so much more than I did. She had experienced more than I (be it going to the movies alone, wearing make-up, a dramatic fight with her best friend, or having a boyfriend), and she was my hero for that. It's interesting that what was impressive was actually silly, unimportant, and even harmful - things that don't matter if what matters is family, love and faithfulness. But they matter to the world: popularity, power, sex, influence, independence.
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Aunt Carley - Master Photographer
I think Poppie took this picture (or was it Aaron?). It's me, Joseph (watching Nana hold a very interesting octopus toy), Carley and Jared. Cousin Jared is just one month older than Joseph (he was born a preemie - he was due one month after Joseph. Quite an ambitious boy, I say). We're looking forward to the fun times these boys will have as they grow up. :)
Carley took this pic of Daddy and Joseph. Aren't they handsome???

And here it is, folks. The all-time greatest picture of Joseph. Taken by Aunt Carley herself. How she was able (in her second attempt!) to capture my sweet baby's elusive smile, I'll never understand. This is the happy boy I see all day long! :)
Thanks for sharing your pics, Carley!
Friday, January 19, 2007
Joseph Jump-Up


